Microsoft vs. The Government Essay examples - 1293 Words

Microsoft vs. The Government Microsoft has developed into an inescapable force within the technological field. Coming from a delayed humble beginning, it has had to devote large sums of money to approach the levels of the founding technological companies. Today, Microsoft controls the market in computer software. How they have achieved this status is what some have come to question. Through â€Å"bundling† software programs, manipulating other computer companies, and packaging deals with personal computers, Microsoft has managed to eradicate nearly all competitors in the computer software market (Love, 1997). This near monopoly affects the entire spectrum of classes, including the consumer, other networking providers,†¦show more content†¦Microsoft has their dominance of the industry at stake. They could potentially come out on top if left to continue their current tactics. They are masterfully â€Å"marketing their products† and it is paying off for them (Love, 1997). The Justice Department charged that Microsoft was unjustly forcing their customers to use the Microsoft internet browser to purchase music online. When a user clicks on the â€Å"Shop for Music Online† links in Windows, they are directed to use Microsoft’s internet browser, even if they want to use another browser (Bridis, 2004). This is unfair because it does not allow consumers to choose their own products. Furthermore, it allows Microsoft to reduce competition with rival browsers. The Justice Department maintains that the most critical concern involved Microsoft’s agreement to license a code to other companies, which allows rival products to communicate with Windows software. As of January 17, 2004, only eleven companies have chosen to license this code, most of which are not much competition for Microsoft. In addition, many companies are accusing Microsoft of demanding unreasonable fees and tedious restrictions for the code license (Krim, 2004). So, it is entirely possible to take the stand that Microsoft is being unfairly attacked simply because it is the leader of theShow MoreRelatedEssay on Microsoft vs. The Government: A Mandate for Compromise1586 Words   |  7 PagesMicrosoft vs. The Government Although somewhat ironic, by now it is not surprising when the pioneer of an enormous industry becomes the focus of controversy. Such is the case for Microsoft Corp., which is currently undergoing many accusations of breaking antitrust laws. Some would argue that the corporation is making deliberate efforts to monopolize the software industry, while those naturally in favor of big business would encourage Microsoft’s â€Å"survival of the fittest† businessRead More The Microsoft Antitrust Story Essay1532 Words   |  7 PagesThe Microsoft Antitrust Story One of the most significant cases in the business world is the US vs. Microsoft. In this case the US asserts that the business practices used by Microsoft create an unfair and dominant market and make them into a powerful monopoly. On the other hand, Microsoft argues that it is being unfairly punished for its success. This case is important because it will greatly affect the economy, other large corporations, its competitors, consumers, and Microsoft’s stockholdersRead More The Microsoft Monopoly Essay1563 Words   |  7 PagesThe Microsoft Monopoly I. Introduction United States vs. Microsoft is one the largest, most controversial antitrust lawsuits in American history. Many claim the government is wrongly punishing Microsoft for being innovative and successful, arguing that Windows dominates the market because of the product’s popularity, not because of malpractice by the parent company. Others argue in favor of the government, claiming that Microsoft’s practices conflict with the free market ideal. There areRead MoreDepartment Of Defense Case Study1422 Words   |  6 Pagesplatform is called Forge.mil, and is used by warfighters, senior military leadership, and operations officials (Nimmer, 2015).   The DoD aims to develop Forge.mil with enough ability to collaborate across multiple platforms to include the U.S. military, government civilians, and network contractors and partners.   Creating such a substantial system would remove barriers for easy collaboration and an efficient system for managing issues quickly (Nimmer, 2015). SoftwareForge was a three-month trial run by theRead MoreCopyright Laws Should Be Abolished Essay1302 Words   |  6 Pagesinefficient. For example, because copyright restrictions require payment of high license fees, many businesses skip the upgrade to Microsoft Office XP despite its important productivity enhancements. A study showed that tasks requiring 43minutes with Office 2000 are accomplished in mere 20minutes with Office XP--over 100% productivity improvement (Microsoft Office XP vs. Office 2000 Comparison Test Public Report). However, the proportion of businesses likely to upgrade from Office 2000 during the firstRead MoreA Comparison of Two Monopolists in a Competitive Market Essay977 Words   |  4 PagesAccording to Webster , to have a monopoly is to have exclusive ownership, possession, or control. The following essay is an examination of Microsoft in comparison to this definition and another commonly known monopoly, Standard Oil. Also attention will be given to the necessary role of and problems with monopolies. Competitive Market vs. Monopoly A competitive market consists of many buyers and sellers. Markets thrive because an equilibrium price is established through natural Read More Government Regulation of the Microsoft Corporation Essay example1611 Words   |  7 PagesGovernment Regulation of the Microsoft Corporation Does the government have the right to regulate large corporations, namely the Microsoft Corporation? If so, then to what extent can the government do so? Based on our research, it is the government’s responsibility to remedy Microsoft’s noncompetitive behavior in order to increase fair competition. The Microsoft vs. the Government trial has many possible outcomes, which may affect a specific party. Not only does the outcome affect theRead MoreApple s : A Fool s Mission1269 Words   |  6 Pagesnydailynews.com/news/national/apple-unlocked-70-iphones-refusal-article-1.2536178 2. San Bernardino shooting http://www.cnn.com/specials/san-bernardino-shooting 3. Government Calls Apple’s iPhone Arguments in San Bernardino Case a ‘Diversion’ http://www.wired.com/2016/03/government-calls-apples-iphone-arguments-san-bernardino-case-diversion/ 4. FBI vs. Apple: A fool’s mission http://www.cdapress.com/news/local_news/article_e78f27a8-0dc2-529c-843e-8e8c42104a5e.html 5. Why Apple s CEO And The FBI Are FightingRead MoreCase Study of Bill Gates1348 Words   |  6 Pages EXAMPLE C THE CASE OF BILL GATES MGMT 368B BUSINESS ETHICS PROBLEM ISSUE AND IDENTIFICATION WHAT ARE THE CENTRAL FACTS OF THE CASE? *William ‘Bill Gates III, Microsoft Corp Chairman, is the most wealthiest businessman there is (http://www.reviewjournal.com/1vrg_home/1997/Apr-02-Wed-1997/news/5134242.html). *Microsoft does not pay its workers as well as some competitors do; however, many workers get stock options. As a result, the worth of these stock options makes one in five of MicrosoftsRead MoreThe Canadian International Trade Tribunal1628 Words   |  7 Pages2014). COMPLAINANT’S POSITION Description of What the Complainant is Seeking and Why: The complainant in the case of Corel vs. the Department of National Revenue is Corel Corporation. On June 12 of 1998, Corel Corporation submitted a complaint (File # PR 98 012) with the Canadian International Trade Tribunal. The complaint was regarding a purchase made by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) for a licence for an enterprise that would be an office automation (OA) suite (CITT, 2014). The

Movie Review The Last Man - 1347 Words

Television is quickly replacing film as the go to form of media when adapting a comic book or novel. Sure, you can write a film based on a book or comic and have it be great, but if it s a lengthy property, that means that a lot of stuff will get cut out. Do you know how fantastic it would be if Harry Potter was adapted for a television series? The books are huge, and although the movies are great, I think that if they adapted the books into a television format, it could have been even better. There are still a lot of comic books and novels that could be adapted for television. These are just a few I thought that should be adapted for television. Y: THE LAST MAN y-the-last-man-social This graphic novel series has been in development hell for years. At one point, Shia Lebeouf was attached to star as Yorick in a film adaptation, but thankfully that disastrous idea fell through. With 60 issues, a movie would have to cut out a lot of stuff to fit in such a rich story, so the film route would feel like a let down if you re a fan of the comic. What would make this television worth is the fact that each comic feels like an episode of television. The series has a satisfying beginning, middle and end to work with. It s not The Walking Dead where the characters go through the same plot over and over and over again. With Y: The Last Man, all the men on the planet have seemingly vanished. Yorick must travel around trying to figure out what happened with people he meets along theShow MoreRelatedRudy, a Review Essay522 Words   |  3 Pages Rudy, set in 1975 is an award winning drama in which years of effort are rewarded by a brief moment of glory. The movie is based on the true story of Daniel Ruttiger, but was also known as Rudy among his family and friends. Rudy was five foot and weighed in at a hundred nothing. People around Rudy looked at him as a person without a spec of talent, but what those people failed to notice was his true talent of determination. Rudy was determined to live out his childhood dream of playin gRead MoreTheseus and Immortals Comparison Analysis Research Paper1121 Words   |  5 PagesThe movie Immortals borrows some of the myth of Theseus for its plot. A lot of the film seems to be a modern attempt at creating a Greek myth. Altogether this film fails to follow the myth of Theseus although it does bring some parts of the myth into it. There are few similarities between the film and the myth. Rewrites are in abundance in the film. At least they placed Theseus with his mother for the opening of the tale. In an obvious rewrite in the film, Theseus finds the Epirus bow inRead MoreGrowing Old: a Psychological Interpretation of About Schmidt862 Words   |  4 Pageshappy either, as everything his wife does annoys him, and he disapproves of the man his daughter is about to marry. When his wife suddenly dies, he sets out to postpone the imminent marriage of his daughter to a man he doesnt like, while coping with discoveries about his late wife and himself in the process. The final stage of Eriksons theory is later adulthood (age 60 years and older). The crisis represented by this last life stage is integrity versus despair. Erikson proposes that this stage beginsRead MoreThe Odyssey Book vs. Movie Version1022 Words   |  5 Pagesdrinking a frappucino from Starbucks. Now, producers and directors would take successful and famous stories and adapt it into a movie. Sometimes, they would succeed, with examples being the Harry Potter series, which received mainly positive reviews from both critics and the audience. However, most of the time these people would unknowingly butcher the book based movie by taking out many important characters and events, with good examples being The Lightning Thief and Eragon. Then another exampleRead More The Last Of The Mohicans : Movie Review Essay771 Words   |  4 PagesThe Last Of The Mohicans : Movie Review A. Plot Whilst making their way to a British Fort, Major Heywood and his party are attacked by Indians. Three men come to their rescue, two of them Indians, and another is a white man whom was raised by the eldest Indian. This man, Hawkeye, his brother and father rescue the Major and the two women that are in his party. Then the three men stay with the party and aide them in their journey to the British Fort. Once there, the two women’s father whom is theRead MoreEssay about Social-Psychological Principles of the Movie Unforgiven1333 Words   |  6 Pagesthe Movie Unforgiven Florida Institute of Technology Most movies have different social-psychological principles, however most people are watching movies to be entertained, and not to psychologically analyze them. There are many different principles that would be applicable to the film we are discussing however, I have chosen to analyze three scenes discussing altruism, self-fulfilling prophecy, and counterfactual thinking. Please review the following scenes and analysis from the movie Unforgiven: Read More Falling Down Essay1042 Words   |  5 PagesFalling Down The 1993 film falling down provides a look into two separate men’s lives in the course of one day. Although the movie was highly acclaimed for it’s portrayal of the new human situation, the covert and overt racism, sexism, and classism leave a sour taste in this viewer’s mouth. The movie comes across as a lame attempt to show the â€Å"White man’s ever growing burden.† The audience is expected to feel a compassion for both lead characters. The message that is supposed to be portrayedRead MoreMovie Analysis : Dad With Jack Lemmon, Ted Danson, And Olympia Dukakis1309 Words   |  6 Pages I chose to watch the movie â€Å"DAD† with Jack Lemmon, Ted Danson, and Olympia Dukakis, just to name a few of the actors. In the past, I’ve seen â€Å"The Notebook† and absolutely loved it, but I wanted to allow myself a new opportunity with a fresh perspective. DAD is a story about family, missed opportunities, and estranged relationships, along with dedication, commitments, and loyalty. I found this movie inspiring, as well as, an accurate portrayal of not only aging, but more importantly, the powerRead MoreFilm Analysis Of Nightcrawler1378 Words   |  6 Pages Nightcrawler (Gilroy, 2014)  is about a young man, Lou Bloom who begins a career in L.A. crime journalism. He does many bizarre and unethical things, and really just goes too far to become successful in the industry.   Throughout the movie, we see how today s news and television culture will go as far as they have to for publicity. From the camera man doing whatever it takes to get a good shot, to the news companies paying top dollar for a film, in the end it s all about getting publicity and moneyRead MoreSex and the City Review Essay1015 Words   |  5 PagesUnlike many, many, many of you out there that completely HATED this movie, I on the other hand was appeased. Right now, I know you all (that have seen the movie) probably think Im nuts, but before you judge me, read my review and explanations. For those who have not yet seen the movie and plan on it: DO NOT READ THIS! Now, I think a huge reason why I didnt find this movie so horrible is because I went in with hugely low expectations based on the trailer, so the few funny and likable parts

Descartes Arguments for Substance Dualism Essay Sample free essay sample

Does Descartes supply a convincing statement for the claim that head and affair are distinguishable substances Descartes’ Argument For Dualism In his Meditations Rene Descartes aimed to retrace the whole of scientific discipline by seeking to turn out the differentiation between head and affair. He gives an statement from uncertainty. and another from conceivableness. I will give a brief sum-up of the foundations Descartes builds his thesis on. and so looking at his statements and whether they are capable of carrying us that dualism is a logical stance to keep. To what extent if any is Descartes successful in demoing there is a existent differentiation between head and organic structure In Descartes’ Meditations. Descartes purposes to reshape the whole of scientific discipline by get downing from foundations that can be deductively proved. I will briefly summarise and knock the of import parts of the speculations on which his dualist statement remainders and so travel through each of the statements that he raises in order to turn out the sharpness of head and organic structure and critique each of them. I will concentrate on the logic behind his statements. happening holes in his scheme and topographic points where he fails to turn out the following measure. With this I will demo that Descartes is non successful in demoing that there is a existent differentiation between head and organic structure. In the Meditations. Descartes purposes to happen a house foundation for cognition. to happen beyond doubt cognition. to rebut agnosticism and vindicate rationalism. and to turn out the being of God. Though a positivist himself. Descartes assumes a doubting attack when sing what we can be certain of. He rapidly rejects a priori and a posteriori cognition. reasoning in Meditation 2. that all he can be certain of is his ain being in some signifier. From here he uses an ontological statement to confirm the being of a perfect God. Using these foundations builds an statement to retrace scientific discipline. and to demo that â€Å"it is certain that this I is wholly and perfectly distinguishable from my organic structure. and can be without it. † In Meditations. he begins by first rendering any idea or construct. of which there can be doubt. negligible so that all he would be left with is things that are unimpeachably true. The first thing that he proves is the fact that he exists. He shows that as he is believing. he must needfully be in some signifier. From this he proves the being of God utilizing an ontological statement and from both of these foundations he aims to deduce scientific discipline as a whole. Argument from KernelIn Descartes’ 2nd speculation. he shows that although he knows that he exists. he wants to first work out what it is that he is ( AT 7:25-28 ) . He comes to the decision that his kernel is believing. He is a intelligent thing. But does his organic structure represent a portion of his kernel excessively? Descartes uses the undermentioned statement to demo that his organic structure is non a portion of his kernel. – If I was a organic structure so doubts about my organic structure would be uncertainties about my being – I doubt my organic structure as it can non be conceived clearly and clearly – I do be as proven by the Cognito – Therefore I can non be a organic structure. One can clearly and clearly believe of the head as something that thinks and is unextended ( immaterial ) . whereas the organic structure is extended and can non believe. This means that one can gestate of a believing thing without extension i. e. a head without affair. Harmonizing to Descartes earlier speculations. this means that God could hold created made them as distinct. Therefore. they must be distinguishable as if they weren’t. non even God could make them that manner ( AT 7:121 ) . The job here is in the fact that Descartes has presumed his kernel is to believe. He has proven that he does be and he does believe. His statement for his kernel to be thought itself nevertheless is limited by his subjective point of position. One can see that if we imagine an inanimate object such as a tabular array begins to believe. the tabular array itself could come to the same decision as Descartes through the cogito that it is a intelligent thing. Then one could see that God could ta ke away that ability to believe. and it would still stay a tabular array. It’s kernel is non to believe. We can so utilize this statement to see that it may be that the organic structure is portion of one’s kernel but we can non cognize this a priori. We have to be able to take an nonsubjective point of position ( AT 7:198 ) . If one takes the above response to Descartes’ statement. one can see that Descartes is guilty of some little round logical thinking. He assumes that the head is immaterial itself and its lone kernel is believing. This can non be proven. Yet. we can see how the head in modern times may be explained from a materialist point of position. Therefore as the first premiss can non be proven. the statement is no longer valid. Argument from Conceivability In his 6th speculation Descartes provides the Argument from Conceivability to convert us of dualism: It is imaginable that I exist in idea. without my extended organic structure besides bing. Furthermore it is possible that I. a thought being. can be without my extended organic structure bing. If it is logically possible that I can be without my organic structure bing so they are non indistinguishable and therefore separate entities. Therefore I. a thought being. am non the same as my drawn-out organic structure. The Argument from Conceivability falls short on soundness – conceivableness is non sufficient for logical possibility. For illustration. in figure theory one of the greatest unresolved hypothesis is Goldbach’s speculation. That is that every positive whole number greater or equal to 4 can be expressed as the amount of two primes. So though I may be able to gestate of some figure being discovered that is non the amount of two primes. if the speculation is needfully true ( proved or otherwise. ) I will hold conceived of a logical impossibleness. Thus Descartes premises are false and fail to convert us of substance dualism. Furthermore. Descartes relies on holding a thorough cognition of head and organic structure. We may reason with Descartes that idea is necessary to holding a head. and materiality is necessary to holding a organic structure. it does non necessarily follow that there is an entity whose exclusive nature is to believe. Descartes is limited by his subjective point of view that it could non be the instance that extension could be another belongings of head. He needs to turn out the stronger statement that it is non possible for the head to hold extension as one of it’s belongingss. Descartes attempts to do this cogent evidence in his Divisibility Argument: Similar to this is the Argument from Distinctness which argues for the logical possibility of dividing head from organic structure. To make this. head and organic structure would hold to be distinguishable and therefore it would turn out both things. – I can conceive of myself as a believing thing bing apart from the organic structure ( as shown by the different kernels in the statement from kernel. ) . – It is imaginable that a believing thing can be without a organic structure – It is possible that a believing thing can be without a organic structure – A believing thing is non a organic structure The first premiss has some major issues if we refer back to our expostulations to the statement from kernel. We came to the decision that Descartes has non satisfactorily turn out the fact that a believing thing can be outside the organic structure as he jumps from the fact that he thinks to the fact that his whole kernel is believing without any extension. It seems really difficult to believe of an immaterial substance with causal force bing on its ain without affair. If this is so the statement fails on premiss one. If the first premiss is taken to be true. so there are still issues with this statement. It rests on the fact that if two objects are the same object so you can non hold one without the other. This is a logical truth. However. it seems that the fact something can be imagined is non a dependable premiss for possibility. There are colorss past our scope of sight that we can non conceive of which are possible and likewise there are things such as Lois Lane could conceive of Clark Kent without Superman. However. this is impossible as they are the same individual. These illustrations are epistemological possibilities and non metaphysical 1s. so one has to work out what type of possibility is shown in the statement utilizing head and organic structure. To work this out. one would hold to see objectively a posteriori if it is possible which in itself is impossible to make whilst life. If one dies and it is separated. the head is immaterial and therefore it seems intangible. So we can non tu rn out it right or incorrect. Argument from Doubt Descartes’ statement from uncertainty can be summarised as follows: It is possible for me to doubt the being of everything stuff. However. I can non doubt the being of my ain head. as denial would be self-contradictory. Therefore. my organic structure and head are non indistinguishable but are distinguishable from one another. This statement from the discourse on the Method This statement for dualism is flimsy as it is logically invalid. For illustration. though David Cameron may be able to claim uncertainness as to whether the Prime Minister exists. he can be certain of his ain being. From this it does non follow that David Cameron and the Prime Minister are distinguishable existences. To decide the invalidness of Descartes’ statement. a new premiss can be added –Leibniz’s Law of the Indiscernibility of the Identicals. That is. if any two objects are indistinguishable. they are one and the same. they portion the same belongingss. However even by adding this new premiss. the statement is still flimsy as it is delegating a different type of belongings to uncertainty. than the sort of belongings Leibniz is mentioning to. For illustration. in Grecian mythology Oedipus wanted to get married Jocasta although he had no desire to get married his female parent. It would look that the Argument from Doubt is an epistemological claim instead than a metaphysical one. edifying us more to our manner of believing instead than the nature of world. In the discourse on the Method. Descartes argues utilizing Leibniz’s Law of the Identity of Indiscernible which states that two objects are indistinguishable if and merely if they have all the same belongingss. – As I doubt that my organic structure exists – And I do non doubt that I and my ideas exist – Therefore I am non indistinguishable to my organic structure This statement works because the belongings of being doubted does non use to both ideas or the head and the organic structure. Leibniz’s Law states that two objects are indistinguishable if and merely if they have all the same belongingss. Harmonizing to the predating statement of the jurisprudence. this means that head and organic structure can non be the same thing. This is an statement that is easy questionable as one can see that being doubtable is non a belongings of the object itself. If I doubt something. the object does non alter. It is really a statement about the individual who is chew overing on this topic. an epistemological claim and non a metaphysical 1. Due to this. one can non use Leibniz’s jurisprudence to the first two premises and the statement is invalid. The Mark of Truth Much of Descartes’ statements for the distinguishable nature of head and organic structure rely on his old statement in 3rd speculation for the â€Å"mark of truth† ( Hatfield ) . This states that whatever he clearly and clearly perceives is true as his perfect God would non let for such misrepresentation. As Gassendi argues ( AT 7:122 ) . we are non clear as to what the steering dogmas of clear and distinguishable cognition are as we frequently are inexorable about the truth of a fact. we believe our idea is both clear and distinguishable. nevertheless we are mistaken. For illustration. Newtonian Physics which seems to be understood clearly and clearly by Newton which was subsequently disproved by Einstein. Descartes answers in stating that he accepts the demand for a good manner of mensurating clear and distinguishable idea but that the results will ever be unable to be doubted. The avowal of the fact and the idea can non be made otherwise. It would look he is stating that it would hold to be a logical truth. How can one clearly and clearly cognize anything about the existent universe other than one’s ain being. mathematics and logic? It seems that much of Descartes logic is flawed in that it either commentates on human cognition and personal uncertainty and non about the object or it seems to presuppose the sharpness of head and organic structure to get down with. If we exchange the constructs. it seems to convey about things that seem instinctively false. Furthermore. the statement from conceivableness and kernel both rely on the grade of truth and therefore the being of God. both of which have questionable logic themselves. Therefore. Descartes has non been successful in any manner in demoing the distinguishable natures of head and organic structure. Bibliography Descartes. Rene . Oeuvres de Descartes. 11 vols. Ed. Charles Adam and Paul Tannery. Paris: Vrin/CNRS. 1964–76. Hatfield. Gary. Rene Descartes. Ed. Edward N. Zalta. Summer 2011. 25 February 2012. Robinson. Howard. Dualism. Ed. Edward N. Zalta. Winter 2011. 26 February 2012. Wilson. Catherine. Descartes’s Meditations an debut. Cambridge: University Press. 2003.

MIRIAM 3-14-98 Essays - Angels, Islamic View Of Angels,

MIRIAM 3-14-98 ENGLISH BOOK REPORT 7 hr There are many good interesting things about angels.Many people in the world believe in angels , others do not.Whether you believe in them ornot , they are all around us. Angels fight for your soul , against the powers of darkness.In the book Angels written by Billy Grahm there are three main points , angels are real , angels in the gospel and angels in our live today. The first point in the book angels by Billy Grahm is that angels are real. Angels are nearer to you , if you are a believer , than you think. Demonic activity is increasing in our world very rapidly. Gods angels are around us now more than ever in this time of need. Even god himself said in his word that he has given his angels charge over us to keep us in all our ways. On thier hands they will bear you lest you dash your foot against a stone. The second point in the book Angels written by Billy Grahm is , angels in the gospel. Angels are all through the bible. Whether they are delivering messasges or fighting wars , they are there. After all it was an angel who told Mary she would concieve Jesus. It was also an angel who held a flaming sword across a path , and made a donkey talk. Angels are mentioned throughout the bible. So unless you think Gods word is a lie angels are real. Angels in our lives today is the third point in the book Angels by Billy Grahm. There are many stories if angels appearing to people in our society. And there are many things that seem inpossible that happen. Some people say it was angels some dont. Angels are relavent in our lives today even if u think they aren't. God "put a hedge about me" this hedge is angels. God put them around us because they are Gods secret agents. Angels are real and god sais it in his word. They are used as his mesangers or warriors. Whatever they are used for they are sent by god.God said he would put his angels about us. He has been fauthful with this promise , so angels are around always.These past three paragraphs explain the three main points in the book Angels by Billy Graham.